Data group
Climate-related index and scoring
Metric Type
Combined metrics
Methodology/ Standard / Classification/ Taxonomy / Reference
1. Rating provider's methodology
2. ESGBook: Arabesque S-Ray Methodology (Global Compact (GC) Score, ESG Score, Temperature Score)
3. R1ESGo
Unit (e.g. CO2)
1. Climate Risk / ESG Score rating
2. GC Score: (0-100) on human rights, labour right, environment, anti-corruption
3. ESG Score: (0-100) on environmental, social, and governance
4. Temperature Score:
• (tCO2/m$US) on emissions intensity ratio (EIR)
• range from (1.5°C, 2°C, 2.7°C, >2.7°C, 3°C) on the temperature score and is reflected on scenario category
Dimension (e.g. Sector, Customer)
By Entity
Time horizon
Backward-looking
Frequency
Latest update
Time series
Latest update
Accessibility
Public
Observation on data availability/gaps
Different methodologies and scales would require internal evaluation, as it is not transparent on how the ESG scoring is derived. The coverage of companies also varies across these platforms. The Sustainable Banking Assessment (SUSBA) tool shows year-on-year changes and highlights progression or regression in banks’ performance on the integration of environmental and social (E&S) considerations in their corporate strategy and decision-making processes.